#Omniplan agile how to
#Omniplan agile update
#Omniplan agile Patch
#Omniplan agile software
#Omniplan agile plus

Once we have your attention from seeing how this could be someone's worst day, we'll look at how we can patch this up as a Blue Team.

From there, together we'll explore how an attacker can take further control of the cluster via lateral and vertical movements. We'll take advantage of an OWASP vulnerability within a supply chain attack giving us an entry point.

In this session, we're going to start by taking a look at attack paths in and around Kubernetes, acting as a Red Team. We usually trust the hand that feeds, but what happens when we can't trust the hand that feeds us? How do we run applications when there is little to no trust?

#Omniplan agile how to

The Hand That Feeds: How to Misuse Kubernetes

#Omniplan agile software

To encourage and enable more developers to get on the path of DDD, is it reasonable to allow a more pragmatic approach over a principled approach of adhering strictly to DDD guidelines? Should developers be encouraged to start with low-hanging fruit that they can quickly benefit from in their software projects while they continue to learn, to gain a deeper understanding of domain-driven design in order to evolve and adapt their practices as they move closer and closer to the beauty we all know that can be achieved with DDD? Yet learning the principles of DDD can be daunting for developers who are new to it. Domain modeling in particular is very specific with guidance on designing and coordinating the dance between the myriad moving parts in our system. Some of the best minds in the industry have been tuning these practices for years to ensure developers are able to implement proven, successful approaches to software design. There are so many wonderful concepts, philosophies, patterns, practices, and techniques to learn and benefit from. Project X has this (a server, & tasks can be updated through an OSX Dashboard widget), but doesn't support SCRUM (as far as I know) and is in general a huge pain in the to use.Domain-driven design (DDD) is a vast topic.

#Omniplan agile update

The rocking, game-changing feature of this would be to make it server-based, and allow team members to update this on their own. This would show, by resource (& group), something like the attached picture. This view would have a filter (by Resource Group, by Person) which would show the Sprint (or project) and its burndown graph.

#Omniplan agile plus

I really see it as a couple new views on the data, plus some new inputs to support a sprint: In excel, can I create forumlas to give me resource-level data? Sure, but the hope is that the resource-level reporting is all nicely integrated and I don't have to spend a bunch of time with =sumif(blah.) functions. Excel can be used to do a lot of things if you have the time to create all the formulas, but it's not meant to be a PM tool, and I don't want to spend a lot of time futzing with the tool to make it work. What does OmniPlan give you that an Excel (or Google) spreadsheet doesn't?Д®ase of use and resource-level reporting. I want to see what each person is working on, their own personal burndown, allocation, and all the other good stuff.Дoes anyone else have a need for this? I did a lot of plan and control stuff when I worked in professional services, but now that I'm working in internal software development, with fast release cycles, I just find it much less useful. I want to be able to enter the tasks within a time period (whether that be the entire project, end-to-end, or a sprint), their effort (the estimates of which may change day-to-day), and then track the burndown of that effort over our time period and compare it against available remaining hours (based on a standard work week).ДЄs a bonus, I want to measure variance against initial estimates, etc., as a way to help future planning. What I really want is the ability to do two things: While there are dependencies to be 'managed', they are best not managed (for various reasons) through a detailed list of predecessors and successors on a project plan. Our development organization is very much not a plan and control type of group.

Have you thought about implementing any features that would support SCRUM?